<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conditional Statements And Comparison Order - Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.franzone.com/2008/03/04/conditional-statements-and-comparison-order-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.franzone.com/2008/03/04/conditional-statements-and-comparison-order-part-2/</link>
	<description>thoughts of a web geek</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donnie</title>
		<link>http://www.franzone.com/2008/03/04/conditional-statements-and-comparison-order-part-2/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.franzone.com/2008/03/04/conditional-statements-and-comparison-order-part-2/#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>I am with you on this one. While it does make sense I still prefer to use the constant as the second value in a conditional statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you on this one. While it does make sense I still prefer to use the constant as the second value in a conditional statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.463 seconds -->
